In clinical practice, there is often a discrepancy between effort and results when it comes to weight loss. Patients exercise more, eat healthily, and are highly motivated—yet their body weight remains stable. This can also lead to frustration on the part of doctors, as it is not uncommon for them to suspect a lack of discipline. However, the error in thinking often lies elsewhere.
Misconception 1: Weight is a valid marker for therapeutic success.
Body weight is easy to measure, but it says little about fat distribution, insulin sensitivity, inflammatory status, or cardiometabolic risk. Numerous interventions improve precisely these parameters without causing any significant change on the scales. If success is measured solely in terms of weight, relevant health effects remain invisible – and effective measures are mistakenly considered to have failed.
Misconception 2: More effort leads to more weight loss.
This assumption sounds plausible, but often does not stand up in practice. An energy deficit triggers a physiological counter-regulation: resting energy expenditure decreases. At the same time, behavior and well-being change – those affected unconsciously move less outside of planned activities, for example by sitting more or moving less spontaneously. This compensates for part of the deficit. More effort therefore does not automatically lead to more weight loss.
Misconception 3: Losing weight is primarily a behavioral problem.
This view overestimates willpower and underestimates biology – and thus also the psychological strain. Studies show that the body actively regulates weight and fat mass. Hunger, energy consumption, and storage adapt to the nutritional situation, regardless of motivation, insight, or good intentions. For many affected individuals, a lack of success therefore feels like personal failure, even though it is a biological reaction.
Does this sound familiar from your own experience?
Three errors in thinking, many disappointed expectations. In the following articles, we classify these findings based on evidence.
