loader image
Home » Blog » Fasting is good—if you protect your microbiome

Fasting is good—if you protect your microbiome

Fasting has an impres­si­vely posi­tive repu­ta­tion in the medical world: fewer calo­ries, lower insulin levels, less inflamm­a­tion, and more auto­phagy. It sounds like a meta­bolic well­ness break at the cellular level. But right where many tradi­tional fasting regi­mens aim to be parti­cu­larly thorough, problems arise: in so-called colon cleansing.

Bear in mind: The gut is not a drain­pipe, but an ecosystem. And anyone who “cleanses” this ecosystem with Glauber’s salt, Epsom salt, enemas, or colon hydro­the­rapy isn’t just getting rid of supposed waste—they’re also disrupting the micro­bial infra­struc­ture that’s essen­tial for health, immune modu­la­tion, and metabolism.

The Unde­re­sti­mated Player in Metabolism

Short-chain fatty acids, vitamins, anti­oxi­dants, and anti-inflamm­a­tory substances—the intestinal micro­biome produces all of these. Buty­rate, in parti­cular, is considered a meta­bo­li­cally inte­res­ting candi­date: it stabi­lizes the intestinal barrier, has anti-inflamm­a­tory effects, and is asso­ciated with bene­fi­cial effects on body weight.

A diverse micro­biome is thus not merely a deco­ra­tive acces­sory to a healthy diet, but an important func­tional player. Fasting can have a bene­fi­cial effect on the micro­biome. Studies suggest that inter­mit­tent fasting and fasting periods lasting several days can increase micro­bial diver­sity and promote bene­fi­cial bacteria. However, what happens during the eating windows is crucial: Combi­ning inter­mit­tent fasting with a low-fiber diet quickly under­mines the concept.

Colon Clean­sing: An Old Tradi­tion, a Newly Reco­gnized Problem

Many classic fasting proto­cols are from a time when the micro­biome was not considered scien­ti­fi­cally signi­fi­cant. Nowa­days, some aspects of these proto­cols seem outdated. A study on the ten-day Buch­inger fasting regimen—which tradi­tio­nally begins with a bowel cleansing—shows where this can lead: pro-inflamm­a­tory prote­ob­ac­teria increased, while important fiber-meta­bo­li­zing bacteria such as Rumi­no­coc­caceae decreased, an effect that only returns to normal after about three months (Mesnage et al. 2019). Since fasting and bowel clean­sing are inex­tri­cably linked in the Buch­inger protocol, the study leaves open which of the two factors was actually the driving force—one more reason to at least skip the bowel clean­sing as a precau­tion. A bowel cleanse isn’t effec­tive as a “detox” anyway: deto­xi­fi­ca­tion is the job of the liver, the kidneys—and also an intact microbiome.

A large British biobank analysis invol­ving over 500,000 parti­ci­pants suggests that this is not only unplea­sant in the short term but may also have long-term impli­ca­tions: Those who regu­larly took osmotic laxa­tives such as Glauber’s salt or Epsom salt had a signi­fi­cantly increased risk of dementia (Yang et al. 2023, Neuro­logy). Whether the laxa­tives are the direct cause remains unclear—but it’s one more reason not to volun­t­a­rily subject your gut to this procedure.

In prac­tical terms, this means: fasting, yes; “slash-and-burn,” no. More sensible approa­ches include plant-based eating windows, prebiotic fiber, probio­tics, and—contrary to old fasting folklore—coffee.In a large Dutch cohort study conducted by the Univer­sity of Groningen, coffee—along with wine and tea—was among the bever­ages that most strongly promoted the diver­sity of gut bacteria (Zher­na­kova et al. 2016, Science). Your gut flora will likely be grateful.